type

  • Feature Article
  • Podcast
  • Research

theme

  • Instant Activity
  • Food Literacy
  • Outdoor Learning
  • Physically Active Learning
  • Social Emotional Learning
  • Cross-Curricular Learning
  • Models-Based Approach
  • PHE Community
  • Healthy School Communities
  • Fundamental Movement Skills
  • Dance Education
  • Digital Literacy
  • Health Education
  • Financial Literacy
  • Physical Education
  • Sex Education
  • Educational Leadership
  • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
  • Teacher Education
  • Mental Health
  • Substance Use
  • Truth & Reconciliation

Search Results

SORT BY:

Seriously Folks—Why Are We Taking Learning Sitting Down?

April 5, 2022
ipadsitting

Seriously Folks—Why Are We Taking Learning Sitting Down?

It's been on the news, in the papers, and it should come as no surprise that movement is good for our bodies, increases oxygen flow, and promotes our ability to learn and be productive. But despite all we know, a typical school day still tends to be largely sedentary, with screen time taking on an increasingly important role for many students since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

One’s gotta ask—Why are we taking this sitting down?

To be sure, it's never been our (educators’) job before to mitigate the health impacts of sedentary behaviour or screen use on students. The World Health Organization has developed guidelines for minimizing the health impacts of sedentary behaviour, focusing on overall sedentary behaviour and recreational screen time. These health guidelines did not provide recommendations specifically related to sedentary behaviours at school—where teachers and students spend the majority of their waking hours!

To address this key information gap, PHE Canada was part of a project led by the Sedentary Behaviour Research Network (SBRN). The result is the release of the world’s first evidence-based recommendations for school-related sedentary behaviours.

The goal of these recommendations is to provide guidance on how much sedentary behaviour is too much and to kick-start a new set of classroom norms around movement and lesson plans that incorporate movement, including school-related activities such as homework.

Sedentary Behaviour

To be sure, our classrooms and lesson plans are currently designed to keep students in their seats and altering this approach without careful planning can run the risk of disrupting learning. PHE Canada knows as well that it is challenging to integrate changes on top of the other expectations of teachers, especially in typical school schedules based around short learning blocks. And with more and more schoolwork moving online, it is increasingly challenging to limit screen-based learning. A lot of administrative support, creativity and out-of-the-box thinking will need to be employed to start moving in the other direction.

These recommendations provide a starting block for school administrators and empower educators and students to move forward in this work. And remember, as you do move forward, tap a Physical and Health Educator for inspiration—they’ve been doing this work all along!

Who do these recommendations apply to?

These recommendations are for children and youth attending school (typically 5–18 years of age) inclusive of gender, culture, nationality, and socio-economic status.

Who can use these recommendations?

Anyone with an interest in student health and well-being can use these voluntary recommendations to counter sedentary behaviours—including students, educators, school administrators, policymakers, parents/guardians, caregivers, physicians and other healthcare providers.

What are the recommendations?

A healthy school day includes: 

  • Breaking up periods of extended sedentary behaviour with both scheduled and unscheduled movement:
    • At least once every 30 minutes for ages 5–11 years
    • At least once every hour for ages 12–18 years 
  • Incorporating different types of movement into homework whenever possible
  • Limiting sedentary homework to no more than 10 minutes per day, per grade level.     

Screen Use

Regardless of the location, school-related screen time should be meaningful, mentally or physically active, and serve a specific pedagogical purpose that enhances learning compared to alternative methods. When school-related screen time is warranted:

  • Limit time on devices, especially for students 5–11 years of age. 
  • Take a device break at least once every 30 minutes.
  • Discourage media multi-tasking in the classroom and while doing homework.
  • Avoid screen-based homework within an hour of bedtime.

Replacing sedentary learning activities with movement-based learning activities and replacing screen-based learning activities with non-screen-based learning activities can further support students’ health and wellbeing.

How can these recommendations be implemented?

Educators, school administrators, policymakers, parents/guardians, caregivers, physicians and healthcare providers can implement these recommendations using the four Ms approach:

  1. Manage sedentary behaviour.
    • In the classroom and during homework, include light activities that require movement of any body parts and moderate-to-vigorous activities that require greater physical effort.
  2. Encourage Meaningful screen use.
    • Prioritize face-to-face interactions over screen use.
    • Use screens when they are the best pedagogical tool for the job and likely to enhance learning.
    • Prioritize screens for mental and physical engagement, rather than for passive viewing.
    • Turn screens off when not in use, including background TV or videos while doing school or homework.
    • Avoid screen use during meal and snack times.
    • Avoid using screens as the default method for content delivery or classroom management. 
    • Encourage students to review and self-regulate their screen use, and plan time for outdoor play and physical activity.
  3. Educators, healthcare providers, parents and caregivers should Model healthy and meaningful screen use.
  4. Monitor for signs of problematic screen use and follow up with a physician or healthcare provider if concerns arise. Signs of problematic screen use can include:
    • Complaints about being bored or unhappy without access to technology
    • Difficulty accepting screen time limits
    • Screen use that interferes with school, family activities, sleep, physical activity, offline play, or face-to-face interactions
    • Negative emotions following time spent playing video games, texting or using social media

Where can I find the recommendations?

The recommendations are available at sedentarybehaviour.org

Are the recommendations available in other languages?

Yes! Visit sedentarybehaviour.org for a list of all the current translations, including French, Inuktitut, and several others. If you’d like to help us to translate the recommendations into additional languages, please contact us at [email protected].

How were these recommendations created?

These recommendations were developed by an international expert panel convened to develop recommendations to counter sedentary behaviour. The recommendations were informed by research on the relationship between sedentary behaviour and both health and academic outcomes, as well as existing national and international sedentary behaviour guidelines for school-aged children and youth.  The recommendations considered the above research, the views of the expert panelists, and feedback from key stakeholders. Full details on the process used to develop these recommendations can be found in our recent publication in the International Journal of Behavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity and at sedentarybehaviour.org.

Recent Posts

kids using vr
Incorporating Technology into Physical Education: Enhancing Engagement and Learning
[ Feature Article ] In today’s digital world, especially among teens, technology is everywhere. Dismissing it in Physical Education can hinder innovation and disconnect us from students’ needs (Martin & Hultman, 2022). Digital tools like gamified apps can boost motivation and engagement. Rather than resist its growth, we should embrace technology to enrich teaching and enhance student learning (Yau et al., 2022).
Authored by: Dyson MacLeod
person facing away from the camera holding a progressive pride flag
What Educators Need to Know About Alberta’s Gender Policy Legislation
[ Feature Article ] In light of Alberta’s new gender policy legislation, educators are navigating complex intersections between student well-being, parental rights and professional responsibilities. This article overviews Bill 27 highlighting what has changed, what remains, and what educators need to know to support their students with confidence and care. Rooted in learnings from the Ever Active Schools Alberta School Board Policy Clinic, it emphasizes practical strategies to mitigate harm, uphold human rights and foster inclusive learning environments.
Authored by: Kai Williamson
a group of youth smiling with a pride flag
The Well-Being Gap - Highlighting challenges and supports for gender-diverse youth health in BC
[ Feature Article ] In response to the surge in anti-transgender policies across the border and within our own Canadian classrooms, PHE Canada is focusing attention on current developments within our own communities, aiming to champion the rights of gender-diverse youth and areas for attention. The Well-Being Gap: Highlighting challenges and supports for gender-diverse youth health in BC, 2018-2023 provides an in depth look into the health of nearly 500 transgender and over 1000 nonbinary and questioning youth in British Columbia (BC).
Authored by: Martha Gumprich
benchmarks advertisement
Raising the Standard: Why Comprehensive Sexual Health Education Matters in Canada.
[ Feature Article ] Comprehensive sexual health education provides students with the information and skills needed to enhance their sexual health and well-being throughout their lifespan. Sexual health education is essential in school settings. This blogpost highlights how Canadian classrooms have the potential to be an accessible and equitable environment to deliver accurate and inclusive sexual health education. As well, this is a call to action for physical health educators to advocate for and implement sexual health education in their classrooms.
Authored by: Arlette Ibrahim
HRY Logo
Youth as Changemakers: Redefining Violence Prevention
[ Feature Article ] Healthy Relationships for Youth (HRY) is an evidence-based violence prevention program that empowers students through peer facilitation. Developed by the Antigonish Women's Resource Centre and Sexual Assault Services Association (AWRCSASA), HRY engages youth in vital conversations about healthy relationships. Grade 11 and 12 students receive youth-facilitator training for leading a series of twelve engaging, one-hour sessions for Grade 9 students in collaboration with their Healthy Living (Health Education) educator. The program's core mission is to reduce youth violence by instilling vital skills (e.g., communication, boundary setting, etc.) and understanding (e.g., consent, gender norms, social media, diversity and privilege, etc.) for fostering healthy relationships.
Authored by: Dr. Sarah Thomas, Taeya Jones
kids running in a gym
Moving Away From the Beep Test in Physical Education
[ Research ] This article delves into an argument for removing a mandatory Beep Test (i.e., 20 Minute Shuttle Run Test or PACER) in physical education programming. The aim and purpose of education and of various curricula across Canada, as well as the wholistic concepts of health and physical literacy are all discussed. A student-centered, Meaningful Physical Education approach is suggested as a way forward. Solutions to addressing specific barriers to removing the Beep Test from physical education programming are offered using a Meaningful Physical Education framing.
Authored by: Dr. Lisa M. Taylor